Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private was 63.4% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Kyrgyzstan is 63.4%, measured in 2020.
The figure is down 20.6% on the previous year and up 83.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 85.1% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 27.8%, in 2006.
That places Kyrgyzstan 2nd out of 35 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 27.8% | — |
| 2011 | 34.6% | +24.3% |
| 2012 | 34.2% | -1.1% |
| 2013 | 43.0% | +25.8% |
| 2014 | 85.1% | +97.9% |
| 2015 | 67.2% | -21.0% |
| 2016 | 80.4% | +19.5% |
| 2017 | 65.7% | -18.3% |
| 2018 | 67.8% | +3.3% |
| 2019 | 79.9% | +17.8% |
| 2020 | 63.4% | -20.6% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 63.4% is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 23.9%, 2.6× the median. (5 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's 63.4% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 39.5%, 1.6× the median. (11 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.8% | 27.8% | 27.8% | 1 |
| 2010s | 62.0% | 34.2% | 85.1% | 9 |
| 2020s | 63.4% | 63.4% | 63.4% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
- 1 Poland 6,680.8% compare
- 3 Viet Nam 59.8% compare
- 4 Republic of Moldova 58.2% compare
- 5 Kosovo 49.3% compare
- 5 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 49.3% compare
More reference data data for Kyrgyzstan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2833 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6193 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0857 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.8535 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4667 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Kyrgyzstan?
- Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private in Kyrgyzstan was 63.4% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 85.1% in 2014.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 27.8% in 2006.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 2nd out of 35 countries with data for 2020.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 83.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group