Kosovo vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private
Kosovo
49.3%
in 2017
Kyrgyzstan
63.4%
in 2020
Kosovo rank
5th
Kyrgyzstan rank
2nd
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private over time
- Kosovo
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 63.4% against 49.3% in Kosovo, a difference of 14.1%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.3 times Kosovo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kosovo ahead.
Kosovo ranks 5th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 2nd of 35 countries.
Kosovo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.8% | 27.8% | 45.0% | Kosovo |
| 2010s | 46.0% | 44.4% | 1.7% | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private, Kosovo or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 63.4% against 49.3% in Kosovo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private between Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 14.1%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private?
- Kosovo ranks 5th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 2nd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group