Kyrgyzstan vs Viet Nam: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private
Kyrgyzstan
63.4%
in 2020
Viet Nam
59.8%
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
2nd
Viet Nam rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 63.4% against 59.8% in Viet Nam, a difference of 3.6%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Viet Nam's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 2nd and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 35 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.8% | 18.1% | 9.7% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 62.4% | 49.6% | 12.7% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 63.4% | 59.8% | 3.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private, Kyrgyzstan or Viet Nam?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 63.4% against 59.8% in Viet Nam as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private between Kyrgyzstan and Viet Nam?
- 3.6%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Viet Nam rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 2nd and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group