Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions was 82.3% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
82.3%
Change on year
up 6.5%
World rank
4th
of 34 countries
All-time high
82.3%
in 2019
All-time low
55.6%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus, 2008–2019

0204060802008201320192008: 55.62009: 67.22010: 60.52012: 65.72013: 76.82014: 76.72015: 74.92016: 75.62017: 81.12018: 77.32019: 82.3

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus is 82.3%, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.

That represents a change of up 6.5% on the previous year and up 22.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus peaked at 82.3% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 55.6%, in 2008.

That places Belarus 4th out of 34 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 55.6%
2009 67.2% +20.7%
2010 60.5% -10.0%
2012 65.7% +8.7%
2013 76.8% +17.0%
2014 76.7% -0.2%
2015 74.9% -2.3%
2016 75.6% +0.9%
2017 81.1% +7.3%
2018 77.3% -4.7%
2019 82.3% +6.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 61.4% 55.6% 67.2% 2
2010s 74.5% 60.5% 82.3% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 1 Poland 119.2% compare
  2. 2 Romania 103.3% compare
  3. 3 Thailand 96.5% compare
  4. 5 Serbia 70.3% compare
  5. 6 Moldova 63.6% compare
  6. 7 Turkey 63.0% compare

See the full ranking of 34 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions in Belarus was 82.3% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 82.3% in 2019.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 55.6% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
Belarus ranks 4th out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 22.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-urban/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-urban/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
34 places, 347 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group