Belarus vs Republic of Moldova: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Belarus
82.3%
in 2019
Republic of Moldova
63.6%
in 2018
Belarus rank
4th
Republic of Moldova rank
6th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Belarus
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 82.3% against 63.6% in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 18.7%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.3 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 4th and Republic of Moldova ranks 6th of 34 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Belarus or Republic of Moldova?
- Belarus, at 82.3% against 63.6% in Republic of Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Belarus and Republic of Moldova?
- 18.7%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Republic of Moldova?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do Belarus and Republic of Moldova rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Belarus ranks 4th and Republic of Moldova ranks 6th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group