Belarus vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Belarus
82.3%
in 2019
Poland
119.2%
in 2019
Belarus rank
4th
Poland rank
1st
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Belarus
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 119.2% against 82.3% in Belarus, a difference of 36.9%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.4 times Belarus's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 4th and Poland ranks 1st of 34 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.4% | 87.6% | 26.2% | Poland |
| 2010s | 73.3% | 99.3% | 26.0% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Belarus or Poland?
- Poland, at 119.2% against 82.3% in Belarus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Belarus and Poland?
- 36.9%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Belarus ranks 4th and Poland ranks 1st of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group