Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Ecuador

Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers was 12.6% in 2022. ▼ Falling

Latest (2022)
12.6%
Change on year
down 3.0%
World rank
33rd
of 36 countries
All-time high
38.0%
in 2012
All-time low
11.4%
in 2019
Years of data
13
2008–2022

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Ecuador, 2008–2022

102030402008201520222008: 32.52010: 33.62011: 32.92012: 382014: 22.12015: 162016: 21.22017: 13.82018: 13.72019: 11.42020: 13.62021: 132022: 12.6

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Ecuador is 12.6%, measured in 2022.

The figure is down 3.0% on the previous year and down 66.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Ecuador peaked at 38.0% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 11.4%, in 2019.

Ecuador ranks 33rd of 36 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Ecuador, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Ecuador, 2008 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2008 32.5%
2010 33.6% +3.6%
2011 32.9% -2.3%
2012 38.0% +15.8%
2014 22.1% -41.9%
2015 16.0% -27.6%
2016 21.2% +32.3%
2017 13.8% -34.9%
2018 13.7% -0.7%
2019 11.4% -16.9%
2020 13.6% +19.3%
2021 13.0% -4.4%
2022 12.6% -3.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 32.5% 32.5% 32.5% 1
2010s 22.5% 11.4% 38.0% 9
2020s 13.0% 12.6% 13.6% 3

Countries ranked near Ecuador

  1. 30 Côte d'Ivoire 14.4% compare
  2. 31 Belarus 13.4% compare
  3. 32 Pakistan 12.9% compare
  4. 34 Panama 12.4% compare
  5. 35 Burkina Faso 6.7% compare
  6. 36 Malawi 5.5% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Ecuador

All data for Ecuador →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Ecuador?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Ecuador was 12.6% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Ecuador?
The highest recorded value was 38.0% in 2012.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Ecuador?
The lowest recorded value was 11.4% in 2019.
How does Ecuador rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
Ecuador ranks 33rd out of 36 countries with data for 2022.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Ecuador?
Over the last ten years it is down 66.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Ecuador data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Ecuador. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/ecuador/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Ecuador</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 350 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group