Belarus vs Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Belarus
13.4%
in 2019
Ecuador
12.6%
in 2022
Belarus rank
31st
Ecuador rank
33rd
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Belarus
- Ecuador
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 13.4% against 12.6% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Ecuador ahead.
Belarus ranks 31st and Ecuador ranks 33rd of 36 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.4% | 32.5% | 24.0% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 13.4% | 21.2% | 7.9% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Belarus or Ecuador?
- Belarus, at 13.4% against 12.6% in Ecuador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Belarus and Ecuador?
- 0.8%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Belarus ranks 31st and Ecuador ranks 33rd of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group