Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus

Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers was 13.4% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
13.4%
Change on year
up 20.4%
World rank
31st
of 36 countries
All-time high
16.4%
in 2014
All-time low
8.4%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus, 2008–2019

0510152008201320192008: 8.42009: 11.82010: 122012: 13.32013: 152014: 16.42015: 13.12016: 14.52017: 132018: 11.22019: 13.4

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 13.4% for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in 2019.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 20.4% on the previous year and up 14.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus peaked at 16.4% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 8.4%, in 2008.

Belarus ranks 31st of 36 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 8.4%
2009 11.8% +39.3%
2010 12.0% +1.8%
2012 13.3% +11.2%
2013 15.0% +12.9%
2014 16.4% +9.0%
2015 13.1% -19.9%
2016 14.5% +10.1%
2017 13.0% -9.9%
2018 11.2% -14.3%
2019 13.4% +20.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 10.1% 8.4% 11.8% 2
2010s 13.6% 11.2% 16.4% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 28 Brazil 16.0% compare
  2. 29 Paraguay 15.5% compare
  3. 30 Côte d'Ivoire 14.4% compare
  4. 32 Pakistan 12.9% compare
  5. 33 Ecuador 12.6% compare
  6. 34 Panama 12.4% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus?
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers in Belarus was 13.4% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 16.4% in 2014.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 8.4% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
Belarus ranks 31st out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 14.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-2nd-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/belarus/">Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 350 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group