Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Serbia

Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 36.7% in 2022. ▼ Falling

Latest (2022)
36.7%
Change on year
up 24.9%
World rank
13th
of 35 countries
All-time high
72.9%
in 2007
All-time low
29.4%
in 2021
Years of data
8
2007–2022

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Serbia, 2007–2022

0204060802007201420222007: 72.92010: 45.32013: 39.82015: 50.32018: 60.42019: 49.22021: 29.42022: 36.7

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Serbia recorded 36.7% for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in 2022.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 24.9% on the previous year and down 7.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Serbia peaked at 72.9% in 2007 and was at its lowest, 29.4%, in 2021.

Serbia ranks 13th of 35 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Serbia, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Serbia, 2007 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2007 72.9%
2010 45.3% -37.9%
2013 39.8% -12.2%
2015 50.3% +26.6%
2018 60.4% +19.9%
2019 49.2% -18.6%
2021 29.4% -40.3%
2022 36.7% +24.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 72.9% 72.9% 72.9% 1
2010s 49.0% 39.8% 60.4% 5
2020s 33.0% 29.4% 36.7% 2

Countries ranked near Serbia

  1. 10 Romania 46.9% compare
  2. 11 Costa Rica 39.0% compare
  3. 12 Dominican Republic 37.0% compare
  4. 14 Sri Lanka 36.2% compare
  5. 15 Paraguay 35.7% compare
  6. 16 Colombia 31.5% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Serbia

All data for Serbia →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Serbia?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Serbia was 36.7% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Serbia?
The highest recorded value was 72.9% in 2007.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Serbia?
The lowest recorded value was 29.4% in 2021.
How does Serbia rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
Serbia ranks 13th out of 35 countries with data for 2022.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Serbia?
Over the last ten years it is down 7.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Serbia data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Serbia. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/serbia/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Serbia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group