Costa Rica vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Costa Rica
39.0%
in 2022
Serbia
36.7%
in 2022
Costa Rica rank
11th
Serbia rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Costa Rica
- Serbia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 39.0% against 36.7% in Serbia, a difference of 2.3%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 11th and Serbia ranks 13th of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 34.1% | 51.3% | 17.2% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 38.5% | 33.0% | 5.5% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Costa Rica or Serbia?
- Costa Rica, at 39.0% against 36.7% in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Costa Rica and Serbia?
- 2.3%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Costa Rica and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Costa Rica ranks 11th and Serbia ranks 13th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group