Paraguay vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Paraguay
35.7%
in 2022
Serbia
36.7%
in 2022
Paraguay rank
15th
Serbia rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Paraguay
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 36.7% against 35.7% in Paraguay, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Paraguay ranks 15th and Serbia ranks 13th of 35 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.1% | 72.9% | 35.9% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 38.5% | 49.0% | 10.5% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 30.0% | 33.0% | 3.0% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Paraguay or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 36.7% against 35.7% in Paraguay as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Paraguay and Serbia?
- 1.0%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Serbia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2022.
- How do Paraguay and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Paraguay ranks 15th and Serbia ranks 13th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group