Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Poland

Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 11,437.8% in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
11,437.8%
Change on year
up 79,695.8%
World rank
1st
of 35 countries
All-time high
11,437.8%
in 2019
All-time low
12.7%
in 2008
Years of data
12
2005–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Poland, 2005–2019

02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k2005201220192005: 15.82006: 14.32007: 13.72008: 12.72009: 14.12010: 152011: 14.42012: 14.72015: 14.62016: 15.32017: 14.32019: 11.4k

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Poland stood at 11,437.8%. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

The figure is up 79,695.8% on the previous year and up 80,915.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Poland peaked at 11,437.8% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 12.7%, in 2008.

Poland ranks 1st of 35 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Poland, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Poland, 2005 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2005 15.8%
2006 14.3% -9.1%
2007 13.7% -4.3%
2008 12.7% -7.7%
2009 14.1% +11.4%
2010 15.0% +6.1%
2011 14.4% -4.0%
2012 14.7% +1.9%
2015 14.6% -0.5%
2016 15.3% +4.9%
2017 14.3% -6.2%
2019 11,437.8% +79695.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 14.1% 12.7% 15.8% 5
2010s 1,646.6% 14.3% 11,437.8% 7

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 2 Armenia 86.8% compare
  2. 3 Kyrgyzstan 69.5% compare
  3. 4 Republic of Moldova 68.4% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Poland?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Poland was 11,437.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 11,437.8% in 2019.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 12.7% in 2008.
How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
Poland ranks 1st out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is up 80,915.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/poland/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Poland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group