Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Kyrgyzstan
69.5%
in 2020
Poland
11,437.8%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
3rd
Poland rank
1st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 11,437.8% against 69.5% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 11,368.3%.
That makes Poland's figure about 164.6 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 1st of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.3% | 14.3% | 42.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 67.4% | 1,918.5% | 1,851.1% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Poland, at 11,437.8% against 69.5% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 11,368.3%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 1st of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group