Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Republic of Moldova

Republic of Moldova: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 68.4% in 2018. ▲ Rising

Latest (2018)
68.4%
Change on year
down 18.1%
World rank
4th
of 35 countries
All-time high
83.5%
in 2017
All-time low
52.0%
in 2010
Years of data
5
2010–2018

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Republic of Moldova, 2010–2018

0204060802010201420182010: 522012: 71.52013: 60.52017: 83.52018: 68.4

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Republic of Moldova recorded 68.4% for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in 2018.

That represents a change of down 18.1% on the previous year and up 31.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Republic of Moldova peaked at 83.5% in 2017 and was at its lowest, 52.0%, in 2010.

Republic of Moldova ranks 4th of 35 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Republic of Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Republic of Moldova, 2010 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2010 52.0%
2012 71.5% +37.4%
2013 60.5% -15.4%
2017 83.5% +38.1%
2018 68.4% -18.1%

Countries ranked near Republic of Moldova

  1. 1 Poland 11,437.8% compare
  2. 2 Armenia 86.8% compare
  3. 3 Kyrgyzstan 69.5% compare
  4. 5 Viet Nam 55.1% compare
  5. 6 Thailand 52.2% compare
  6. 7 Kosovo 51.8% compare
  7. 7 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 51.8% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Republic of Moldova

All data for Republic of Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Republic of Moldova?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Republic of Moldova was 68.4% in 2018, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Republic of Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 83.5% in 2017.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Republic of Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 52.0% in 2010.
How does Republic of Moldova rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
Republic of Moldova ranks 4th out of 35 countries with data for 2018.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Republic of Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is up 31.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Republic of Moldova data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Republic of Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/moldova/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Republic of Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group