Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Thailand

Thailand: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 52.2% in 2021. ▲ Rising

Latest (2021)
52.2%
Change on year
up 13.4%
World rank
6th
of 35 countries
All-time high
52.2%
in 2021
All-time low
2.2%
in 2006
Years of data
7
2006–2021

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Thailand, 2006–2021

02040602006201320212006: 2.22009: 37.22011: 37.82013: 33.52017: 50.72019: 46.12021: 52.2

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Thailand recorded 52.2% for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in 2021. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.

That represents a change of up 13.4% on the previous year and up 38.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Thailand peaked at 52.2% in 2021 and was at its lowest, 2.2%, in 2006.

That places Thailand 6th out of 35 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Thailand, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Thailand, 2006 to 2021.
Year Value Change
2006 2.2%
2009 37.2% +1607.9%
2011 37.8% +1.5%
2013 33.5% -11.3%
2017 50.7% +51.3%
2019 46.1% -9.2%
2021 52.2% +13.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 19.7% 2.2% 37.2% 2
2010s 42.0% 33.5% 50.7% 4
2020s 52.2% 52.2% 52.2% 1

Countries ranked near Thailand

  1. 3 Kyrgyzstan 69.5% compare
  2. 4 Republic of Moldova 68.4% compare
  3. 5 Viet Nam 55.1% compare
  4. 7 Kosovo 51.8% compare
  5. 7 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 51.8% compare
  6. 9 South Africa 51.3% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Thailand

All data for Thailand →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Thailand?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Thailand was 52.2% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Thailand?
The highest recorded value was 52.2% in 2021.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Thailand?
The lowest recorded value was 2.2% in 2006.
How does Thailand rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
Thailand ranks 6th out of 35 countries with data for 2021.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Thailand?
Over the last ten years it is up 38.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Thailand data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Thailand. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/thailand/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Thailand</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group