Romania vs East Timor: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Romania
0.4409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
East Timor
0.4327 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Romania rank
76th
East Timor rank
77th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Romania
  • East Timor
-2-101199620102025

How they compare

Romania currently reports 0.4409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4327 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in East Timor, a difference of 0.0082 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Romania ahead.

Romania ranks 76th and East Timor ranks 77th of 208 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania East Timor Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0818 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -2.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 2.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Romania
2000s 0.388 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2347 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Romania
2010s 0.4661 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.209 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.257 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Romania
2020s 0.5239 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.411 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Romania or East Timor?
Romania, at 0.4409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4327 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in East Timor as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Romania and East Timor?
0.0082 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and East Timor?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Romania and East Timor rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Romania ranks 76th and East Timor ranks 77th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs East Timor: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/romania/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/romania/timor-leste/">Romania vs East Timor: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.