Mongolia vs North Macedonia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Mongolia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.1269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0737 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.0532 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.7 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 92nd and North Macedonia ranks 95th of 206 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4026 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5399 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9425 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0.2544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0463 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3007 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.1649 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1692 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.334 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.1513 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.008 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1593 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Mongolia or North Macedonia?
- Mongolia, at 0.1269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0737 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Mongolia and North Macedonia?
- 0.0532 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and North Macedonia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Mongolia and North Macedonia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Mongolia ranks 92nd and North Macedonia ranks 95th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.