Macau (China) vs Peru: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Macau (China)
0.0636 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Peru
0.0456 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Macau (China) rank
96th
Peru rank
98th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Macau (China)
  • Peru
-0.500.5199620102024

How they compare

Macau (China) currently reports 0.0636 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0456 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Peru, a difference of 0.018 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Macau (China)'s figure about 1.4 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Macau (China) ahead.

Macau (China) ranks 96th and Peru ranks 98th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Macau (China) averaged higher in 3 and Peru in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau (China) Peru Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1342 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6563 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7904 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Macau (China)
2000s 0.3239 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1126 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Macau (China)
2010s 0.4679 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2859 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.182 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Macau (China)
2020s 0.1573 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0258 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Macau (China) or Peru?
Macau (China), at 0.0636 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0456 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Peru as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Macau (China) and Peru?
0.018 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Macau (China) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau (China) and Peru?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Macau (China) and Peru rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Macau (China) ranks 96th and Peru ranks 98th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau (China) vs Peru: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/macao-sar-china/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/macao-sar-china/peru/">Macau (China) vs Peru: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.