Macao vs North Macedonia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Macao
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 0.0737 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0636 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Macao, a difference of 0.0101 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.2 times Macao's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Macao ahead.
Macao ranks 96th and North Macedonia ranks 95th of 206 countries.
Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macao | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1342 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5399 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6741 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Macao |
| 2000s | 0.3239 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0463 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3702 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Macao |
| 2010s | 0.4679 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1692 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.637 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Macao |
| 2020s | 0.1573 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.008 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1653 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Macao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Macao or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 0.0737 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0636 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Macao as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Macao and North Macedonia?
- 0.0101 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and North Macedonia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Macao and North Macedonia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Macao ranks 96th and North Macedonia ranks 95th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.