Indonesia vs Malaysia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Indonesia
-0.1663 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Malaysia
-0.1056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Indonesia rank
114th
Malaysia rank
111th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Indonesia
  • Malaysia
-1-0.50199620102025

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports -0.1056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1663 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.0607 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Malaysia ahead.

Indonesia ranks 114th and Malaysia ranks 111th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 3 and Malaysia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Malaysia Difference Ahead
1990s -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6358 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5201 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malaysia
2000s -0.0979 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4809 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Indonesia
2010s 0.1343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2964 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4307 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Indonesia
2020s -0.0072 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1338 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1265 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Indonesia or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at -0.1056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1663 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Indonesia as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Indonesia and Malaysia?
0.0607 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Malaysia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Indonesia and Malaysia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Indonesia ranks 114th and Malaysia ranks 111th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Malaysia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/indonesia/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/indonesia/malaysia/">Indonesia vs Malaysia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.