India vs Malaysia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- India
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports -0.1056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in India, a difference of 0.0466 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was India ahead.
India ranks 113th and Malaysia ranks 111th of 208 countries.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0602 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6358 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | India |
| 2000s | 0.4674 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4809 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9483 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | India |
| 2010s | 0.4152 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2964 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7116 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | India |
| 2020s | -0.0451 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1338 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0886 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, India or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at -0.1056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in India as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between India and Malaysia?
- 0.0466 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Malaysia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do India and Malaysia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- India ranks 113th and Malaysia ranks 111th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.