Hong Kong, China vs Papua New Guinea: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Hong Kong, China
-0.3206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
-0.3264 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Hong Kong, China rank
119th
Papua New Guinea rank
120th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Papua New Guinea
-0.5-0.2500.250.50.75199620102024

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports -0.3206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3264 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0058 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 119th and Papua New Guinea ranks 120th of 207 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 3 and Papua New Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3898 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2326 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6223 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Hong Kong, China
2000s 0.4776 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2914 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7691 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Hong Kong, China
2010s 0.6144 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1539 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7683 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Hong Kong, China
2020s -0.138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1272 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Hong Kong, China or Papua New Guinea?
Hong Kong, China, at -0.3206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3264 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Hong Kong, China and Papua New Guinea?
0.0058 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Papua New Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong, China and Papua New Guinea rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Hong Kong, China ranks 119th and Papua New Guinea ranks 120th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Papua New Guinea: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/hong-kong-sar-china/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/hong-kong-sar-china/papua-new-guinea/">Hong Kong, China vs Papua New Guinea: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 5,285 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.