Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Papua New Guinea

Papua New Guinea: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate was -0.3264 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2024)
-0.3264 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Change on year
down 197.2%
World rank
119th
of 206 countries
All-time high
-0.0378 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2018
All-time low
-0.461 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2004
Years of data
26
1996–2024

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Papua New Guinea, 1996–2024

-0.5-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.1-01996201020241996: -0.157 approx. -2.5 to +2.51998: -0.308 approx. -2.5 to +2.52000: -0.389 approx. -2.5 to +2.52002: -0.457 approx. -2.5 to +2.52003: -0.428 approx. -2.5 to +2.52004: -0.461 approx. -2.5 to +2.52005: -0.332 approx. -2.5 to +2.52006: -0.115 approx. -2.5 to +2.52007: -0.136 approx. -2.5 to +2.52008: -0.157 approx. -2.5 to +2.52009: -0.148 approx. -2.5 to +2.52010: -0.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.52011: -0.191 approx. -2.5 to +2.52012: -0.231 approx. -2.5 to +2.52013: -0.231 approx. -2.5 to +2.52014: -0.186 approx. -2.5 to +2.52015: -0.184 approx. -2.5 to +2.52016: -0.105 approx. -2.5 to +2.52017: -0.099 approx. -2.5 to +2.52018: -0.038 approx. -2.5 to +2.52019: -0.075 approx. -2.5 to +2.52020: -0.051 approx. -2.5 to +2.52021: -0.074 approx. -2.5 to +2.52022: -0.074 approx. -2.5 to +2.52023: -0.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.52024: -0.326 approx. -2.5 to +2.5

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Analysis

In 2024, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Papua New Guinea stood at -0.3264 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 197.2% on the previous year and down 75.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Papua New Guinea peaked at -0.0378 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2018 and was at its lowest, -0.461 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2004.

That places Papua New Guinea 119th out of 206 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s -0.2326 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3079 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1572 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 2
2000s -0.2914 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.461 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1146 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 9
2010s -0.1539 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2314 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0378 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 10
2020s -0.1272 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3264 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 5

Countries ranked near Papua New Guinea

  1. 116 Gambia -0.182 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  2. 117 Georgia -0.2535 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  3. 118 Hong Kong (China) -0.3206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  4. 120 Mexico -0.3383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  5. 121 Kenya -0.3542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  6. 122 Philippines -0.3554 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare

See the full ranking of 206 places →

More reference data data for Papua New Guinea

All data for Papua New Guinea →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Papua New Guinea?
Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Papua New Guinea was -0.3264 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Papua New Guinea?
The highest recorded value was -0.0378 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2018.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Papua New Guinea?
The lowest recorded value was -0.461 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2004.
How does Papua New Guinea rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Papua New Guinea ranks 119th out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Papua New Guinea?
Over the last ten years it is down 75.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Papua New Guinea data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Papua New Guinea. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/papua-new-guinea/">Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Papua New Guinea</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.