Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Hong Kong, China
Hong Kong, China: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate was -0.3206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Hong Kong, China, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2024, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Hong Kong, China stood at -0.3206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. That is the lowest value across all 26 years on record.
That represents a change of down 4.0% on the previous year and down 152.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Hong Kong, China peaked at 0.7519 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2011 and was at its lowest, -0.3206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2024.
Hong Kong, China ranks 118th of 206 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Hong Kong, China, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.5924 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.1872 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -68.4% |
| 2000 | 0.2818 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +50.5% |
| 2002 | 0.3438 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +22.0% |
| 2003 | 0.4037 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.4% |
| 2004 | 0.4236 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.9% |
| 2005 | 0.5472 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +29.2% |
| 2006 | 0.5687 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.9% |
| 2007 | 0.5691 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2008 | 0.5856 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.9% |
| 2009 | 0.5751 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.8% |
| 2010 | 0.5816 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.1% |
| 2011 | 0.7519 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +29.3% |
| 2012 | 0.7264 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.4% |
| 2013 | 0.6692 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.9% |
| 2014 | 0.616 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.0% |
| 2015 | 0.6366 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.3% |
| 2016 | 0.6029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.3% |
| 2017 | 0.6138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.8% |
| 2018 | 0.5803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.4% |
| 2019 | 0.3649 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -37.1% |
| 2020 | 0.2406 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -34.1% |
| 2021 | -0.0977 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -140.6% |
| 2022 | -0.2041 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +108.8% |
| 2023 | -0.3084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +51.1% |
| 2024 | -0.3206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3898 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1872 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5924 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.4776 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2818 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5856 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.6144 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3649 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7519 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2406 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Hong Kong, China
More reference data data for Hong Kong, China
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 4.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 0.2428 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (1990)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0056 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0052 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0072 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric 6.8 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Hong Kong, China?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Hong Kong, China was -0.3206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Hong Kong, China?
- The highest recorded value was 0.7519 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2011.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Hong Kong, China?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.3206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024.
- How does Hong Kong, China rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 118th out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Hong Kong, China?
- Over the last ten years it is down 152.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Hong Kong, China data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.