Bulgaria vs Ghana: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Bulgaria
- Ghana
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 0.2134 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2043 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Ghana, a difference of 0.0091 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bulgaria ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 87th and Ghana ranks 88th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 3 and Ghana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2956 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3794 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6751 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Bulgaria |
| 2000s | 0.5382 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2572 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.281 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Bulgaria |
| 2010s | 0.2436 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4398 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1962 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Ghana |
| 2020s | 0.2109 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0041 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Bulgaria or Ghana?
- Bulgaria, at 0.2134 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2043 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Ghana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Bulgaria and Ghana?
- 0.0091 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Ghana?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Bulgaria and Ghana rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Bulgaria ranks 87th and Ghana ranks 88th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.