Botswana vs Puerto Rico: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Botswana
0.3959 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Puerto Rico
0.3905 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Botswana rank
80th
Puerto Rico rank
81st

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Botswana
  • Puerto Rico
0.20.40.60.81199620102025

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.3959 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3905 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.0054 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Botswana ranks 80th and Puerto Rico ranks 81st of 208 countries.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1990s 0.5834 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4494 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Puerto Rico
2000s 0.6542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8996 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2454 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Puerto Rico
2010s 0.4435 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7362 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2928 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Puerto Rico
2020s 0.3129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4724 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1595 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Botswana or Puerto Rico?
Botswana, at 0.3959 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3905 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Puerto Rico as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Botswana and Puerto Rico?
0.0054 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Puerto Rico?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Botswana and Puerto Rico rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Botswana ranks 80th and Puerto Rico ranks 81st of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Puerto Rico: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/botswana/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/botswana/puerto-rico-us/">Botswana vs Puerto Rico: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.