Botswana vs Bulgaria: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Botswana
0.2953 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Bulgaria
0.2134 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Botswana rank
84th
Bulgaria rank
87th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Botswana
  • Bulgaria
00.20.40.60.8199620102024

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.2953 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2134 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bulgaria, a difference of 0.0819 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.4 times Bulgaria's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 84th and Bulgaria ranks 87th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Bulgaria in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Bulgaria Difference Ahead
1990s 0.5595 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2956 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2639 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Botswana
2000s 0.627 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5382 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0888 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Botswana
2010s 0.352 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2436 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Botswana
2020s 0.1971 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2109 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bulgaria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Botswana or Bulgaria?
Botswana, at 0.2953 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2134 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bulgaria as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Botswana and Bulgaria?
0.0819 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Bulgaria?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Botswana and Bulgaria rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Botswana ranks 84th and Bulgaria ranks 87th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Bulgaria: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/botswana/bulgaria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/botswana/bulgaria/">Botswana vs Bulgaria: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.