Papua New Guinea vs Puerto Rico: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

Papua New Guinea
1,350 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Puerto Rico
1,350 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Papua New Guinea rank
100th
Puerto Rico rank
100th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Puerto Rico
05001.0k1.5k200520092014

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 1,350 DB06-15 methodology against 1,350 DB06-15 methodology in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 DB06-15 methodology.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 100th and Puerto Rico ranks 100th of 184 countries.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
2000s 1,402 DB06-15 methodology 1,545 DB06-15 methodology 143.29 DB06-15 methodology Puerto Rico
2010s 1,283 DB06-15 methodology 1,353 DB06-15 methodology 70.91 DB06-15 methodology Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), Papua New Guinea or Puerto Rico?
Papua New Guinea, at 1,350 DB06-15 methodology against 1,350 DB06-15 methodology in Puerto Rico as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between Papua New Guinea and Puerto Rico?
0 DB06-15 methodology, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Puerto Rico?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Papua New Guinea and Puerto Rico rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
Papua New Guinea ranks 100th and Puerto Rico ranks 100th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Puerto Rico: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/papua-new-guinea/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/papua-new-guinea/puerto-rico-us/">Papua New Guinea vs Puerto Rico: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,819 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.