Luxembourg vs North Macedonia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

Luxembourg
1,420 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
North Macedonia
1,380 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Luxembourg rank
92nd
North Macedonia rank
95th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Luxembourg
  • North Macedonia
05001.0k1.5k200520092014

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 1,420 DB06-15 methodology against 1,380 DB06-15 methodology in North Macedonia, a difference of 40 DB06-15 methodology.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Luxembourg ranks 92nd and North Macedonia ranks 95th of 183 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s 1,665 DB06-15 methodology 1,471 DB06-15 methodology 194.68 DB06-15 methodology Luxembourg
2010s 1,537 DB06-15 methodology 1,407 DB06-15 methodology 130.16 DB06-15 methodology Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), Luxembourg or North Macedonia?
Luxembourg, at 1,420 DB06-15 methodology against 1,380 DB06-15 methodology in North Macedonia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between Luxembourg and North Macedonia?
40 DB06-15 methodology, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and North Macedonia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
How do Luxembourg and North Macedonia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
Luxembourg ranks 92nd and North Macedonia ranks 95th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Luxembourg vs North Macedonia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/luxembourg/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/luxembourg/north-macedonia/">Luxembourg vs North Macedonia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.