Japan vs Panama: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time
- Japan
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 1,030 DB06-15 methodology against 1,021 DB06-15 methodology in Japan, a difference of 9 DB06-15 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Panama ahead.
Japan ranks 131st and Panama ranks 129th of 183 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,007 DB06-15 methodology | 963 DB06-15 methodology | 43.8 DB06-15 methodology | Japan |
| 2010s | 1,049 DB06-15 methodology | 943.92 DB06-15 methodology | 105.24 DB06-15 methodology | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), Japan or Panama?
- Panama, at 1,030 DB06-15 methodology against 1,021 DB06-15 methodology in Japan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between Japan and Panama?
- 9 DB06-15 methodology, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Panama?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Japan and Panama rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
- Japan ranks 131st and Panama ranks 129th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.