Hong Kong vs Malaysia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

Hong Kong
565 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Malaysia
560 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Hong Kong rank
179th
Malaysia rank
181st

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Malaysia
0200400600200520092014

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 565 DB06-15 methodology against 560 DB06-15 methodology in Malaysia, a difference of 5 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Malaysia ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 179th and Malaysia ranks 181st of 184 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Malaysia Difference Ahead
2000s 580.64 DB06-15 methodology 490.74 DB06-15 methodology 89.9 DB06-15 methodology Hong Kong
2010s 583.55 DB06-15 methodology 485.36 DB06-15 methodology 98.19 DB06-15 methodology Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), Hong Kong or Malaysia?
Hong Kong, at 565 DB06-15 methodology against 560 DB06-15 methodology in Malaysia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between Hong Kong and Malaysia?
5 DB06-15 methodology, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Malaysia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Hong Kong and Malaysia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
Hong Kong ranks 179th and Malaysia ranks 181st of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Malaysia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/hong-kong-sar-china/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/hong-kong-sar-china/malaysia/">Hong Kong vs Malaysia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,819 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.