El Salvador vs Japan: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

El Salvador
1,035 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Japan
1,021 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
El Salvador rank
129th
Japan rank
132nd

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • El Salvador
  • Japan
02505007501.0k200520092014

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 1,035 DB06-15 methodology against 1,021 DB06-15 methodology in Japan, a difference of 14 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Japan ahead.

El Salvador ranks 129th and Japan ranks 132nd of 184 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Japan Difference Ahead
2000s 825.4 DB06-15 methodology 1,007 DB06-15 methodology 181.41 DB06-15 methodology Japan
2010s 1,003 DB06-15 methodology 1,049 DB06-15 methodology 46.5 DB06-15 methodology Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), El Salvador or Japan?
El Salvador, at 1,035 DB06-15 methodology against 1,021 DB06-15 methodology in Japan as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between El Salvador and Japan?
14 DB06-15 methodology, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Japan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do El Salvador and Japan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
El Salvador ranks 129th and Japan ranks 132nd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Japan: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/el-salvador/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/el-salvador/japan/">El Salvador vs Japan: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,819 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.