Cyprus vs Pakistan: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

Cyprus
1,010 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Pakistan
1,005 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Cyprus rank
132nd
Pakistan rank
134th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Cyprus
  • Pakistan
05001.0k1.5k200520092014

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 1,010 DB06-15 methodology against 1,005 DB06-15 methodology in Pakistan, a difference of 5 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Pakistan ahead.

Cyprus ranks 132nd and Pakistan ranks 134th of 183 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Pakistan Difference Ahead
2000s 1,022 DB06-15 methodology 1,318 DB06-15 methodology 295.87 DB06-15 methodology Pakistan
2010s 1,007 DB06-15 methodology 973.64 DB06-15 methodology 33.61 DB06-15 methodology Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), Cyprus or Pakistan?
Cyprus, at 1,010 DB06-15 methodology against 1,005 DB06-15 methodology in Pakistan as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between Cyprus and Pakistan?
5 DB06-15 methodology, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Pakistan?
7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
How do Cyprus and Pakistan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
Cyprus ranks 132nd and Pakistan ranks 134th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Pakistan: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/cyprus/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/cyprus/pakistan/">Cyprus vs Pakistan: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.