Chile vs Kiribati: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

Chile
860 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Kiribati
910 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Chile rank
144th
Kiribati rank
141st

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Chile
  • Kiribati
05001.0k1.5k200520092014

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 910 DB06-15 methodology against 860 DB06-15 methodology in Chile, a difference of 50 DB06-15 methodology.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kiribati ahead.

Chile ranks 144th and Kiribati ranks 141st of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Kiribati Difference Ahead
2000s 850.85 DB06-15 methodology 1,307 DB06-15 methodology 456.19 DB06-15 methodology Kiribati
2010s 878.17 DB06-15 methodology 862.61 DB06-15 methodology 15.56 DB06-15 methodology Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), Chile or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 910 DB06-15 methodology against 860 DB06-15 methodology in Chile as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between Chile and Kiribati?
50 DB06-15 methodology, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kiribati?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Chile and Kiribati rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
Chile ranks 144th and Kiribati ranks 141st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Kiribati: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/chile/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/chile/kiribati/">Chile vs Kiribati: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.