Belarus, Republic of vs Jamaica: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

Belarus, Republic of
2,265 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Jamaica
2,180 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Belarus, Republic of rank
41st
Jamaica rank
43rd

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Belarus, Republic of
  • Jamaica
05.0k10.0k15.0k200520092014

How they compare

Belarus, Republic of currently reports 2,265 DB06-15 methodology against 2,180 DB06-15 methodology in Jamaica, a difference of 85 DB06-15 methodology.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Belarus, Republic of has been ahead every year.

Belarus, Republic of ranks 41st and Jamaica ranks 43rd of 183 countries.

Belarus, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus, Republic of Jamaica Difference Ahead
2000s 12,048 DB06-15 methodology 3,667 DB06-15 methodology 8,381 DB06-15 methodology Belarus, Republic of
2010s 5,450 DB06-15 methodology 2,423 DB06-15 methodology 3,027 DB06-15 methodology Belarus, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), Belarus, Republic of or Jamaica?
Belarus, Republic of, at 2,265 DB06-15 methodology against 2,180 DB06-15 methodology in Jamaica as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between Belarus, Republic of and Jamaica?
85 DB06-15 methodology, with Belarus, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus, Republic of and Jamaica?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Belarus, Republic of and Jamaica rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
Belarus, Republic of ranks 41st and Jamaica ranks 43rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus, Republic of vs Jamaica: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/belarus/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/belarus/jamaica/">Belarus, Republic of vs Jamaica: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.