Moldova vs East Timor: Time to import (days)

Moldova
27 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
East Timor
26 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Moldova rank
52nd
East Timor rank
55th

Time to import (days) over time

  • Moldova
  • East Timor
0102030200520092014

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 27 DB06-15 methodology against 26 DB06-15 methodology in East Timor, a difference of 1 DB06-15 methodology.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.

Moldova ranks 52nd and East Timor ranks 55th of 181 countries.

Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Moldova East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 30.2 DB06-15 methodology 26 DB06-15 methodology 4.2 DB06-15 methodology Moldova
2010s 28.6 DB06-15 methodology 26 DB06-15 methodology 2.6 DB06-15 methodology Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time to import (days), Moldova or East Timor?
Moldova, at 27 DB06-15 methodology against 26 DB06-15 methodology in East Timor as of 2014.
What is the difference in time to import (days) between Moldova and East Timor?
1 DB06-15 methodology, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and East Timor?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Moldova and East Timor rank globally for time to import (days)?
Moldova ranks 52nd and East Timor ranks 55th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The time to import records the time associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calulcated in calendar days. The time calculation for each of the 4 predefined stages starts from the moment the stage is initiated and runs until it is completed. Fast-track procedures applying only to certain accredited firms under authorized economic operator programs are not taken into account because they are not available to all trading companies. Sea transport time is not included. It is assumed that neither the exporter nor the importer wastes time and that each commits to completing the process without delay. It is assumed that document preparation, inland transport and handling, customs clearance and inspections, and port and terminal handling require a minimum time of 1 day each and cannot take place simultaneously. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.