Jordan vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in

Jordan
66.2%
in 2019
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
66.1%
in 2017
Jordan rank
20th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
21st

Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in over time

  • Jordan
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
020406080199820082019

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 66.2% against 66.1% in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 0.1%.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.

Jordan ranks 20th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 21st of 57 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
2000s 77.6% 58.2% 19.4% Jordan
2010s 64.0% 44.6% 19.4% Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in, Jordan or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
Jordan, at 66.2% against 66.1% in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2019.
What is the difference in teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in between Jordan and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
0.1%, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2010.
How do Jordan and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in?
Jordan ranks 20th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 21st of 57 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in upper secondary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/teaching-staff-compensation-as-a-percentage-of-total-expenditure-in-upper-secondary/jordan/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/teaching-staff-compensation-as-a-percentage-of-total-expenditure-in-upper-secondary/jordan/united-kingdom/">Jordan vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in upper secondary public institutions (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 620 data points, 1995–2019
Last refreshed

Teacher compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate this indicator, divide teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/