Côte d'Ivoire vs Romania: Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in
Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 75.0% against 73.0% in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 2.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 13th and Romania ranks 10th of 60 countries.
Côte d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in, Côte d'Ivoire or Romania?
- Romania, at 75.0% against 73.0% in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2017.
- What is the difference in teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in between Côte d'Ivoire and Romania?
- 2.0%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Romania?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2017.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Romania rank globally for teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 13th and Romania ranks 10th of 60 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in pre-primary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Teacher compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate this indicator, divide teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/