Malta vs Sierra Leone: Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in
Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in over time
- Malta
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 37.8% against 36.2% in Malta, a difference of 1.6%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 20th and Sierra Leone ranks 18th of 35 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.3% | 0.0% | 33.3% | Malta |
| 2010s | 25.4% | 0.0% | 25.4% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in, Malta or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 37.8% against 36.2% in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in between Malta and Sierra Leone?
- 1.6%, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sierra Leone?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2011.
- How do Malta and Sierra Leone rank globally for teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in?
- Malta ranks 20th and Sierra Leone ranks 18th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in post-secondary non-tertiary public institutions (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Teacher compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate this indicator, divide teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/