Congo vs Mozambique: Rule of Law - Governance estimate

Congo
-1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Mozambique
-1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Congo rank
178th
Mozambique rank
180th

Rule of Law - Governance estimate over time

  • Congo
  • Mozambique
-1.5-1.2-1-0.75-0.5199620102024

How they compare

Congo currently reports -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mozambique, a difference of 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mozambique ahead.

Congo ranks 178th and Mozambique ranks 180th of 206 countries.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Mozambique Difference Ahead
1990s -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7162 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5401 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mozambique
2000s -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.585 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mozambique
2010s -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8748 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3028 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mozambique
2020s -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1183 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rule of law - governance estimate, Congo or Mozambique?
Congo, at -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mozambique as of 2024.
What is the difference in rule of law - governance estimate between Congo and Mozambique?
0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mozambique?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Congo and Mozambique rank globally for rule of law - governance estimate?
Congo ranks 178th and Mozambique ranks 180th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Mozambique: Rule of Law - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/rule-of-law-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/congo-rep/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/rule-of-law-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/congo-rep/mozambique/">Congo vs Mozambique: Rule of Law - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,270 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Rule of Law (RL) captures perceptions of the extent to which agents respect and follow the rules of society, including contract enforcement, property rights, the police, courts, and the likelihood of crime and violence. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.