Estonia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)
Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) over time
- Estonia
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 2.4% against 2.3% in Estonia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 78th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 77th of 156 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.0% | 1.3% | 3.7% | Estonia |
| 2010s | 2.9% | 2.2% | 0.7% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), Estonia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 2.4% against 2.3% in Estonia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades) between Estonia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.1%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2015.
- How do Estonia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades)?
- Estonia ranks 78th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 77th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of male repeaters in lower secondary education in a given school year, expressed as a percentage of male enrolment in lower secondary education in the previous school year. Divide the number of male repeaters in lower secondary education in school year t+1 by the number of male pupils from the same cohort enrolled in lower secondary education in the previous school year t.