Hong Kong, China vs Serbia: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education
Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0.9181 LTPIA against 0.9118 LTPIA in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.0063 LTPIA.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 6th and Serbia ranks 5th of 47 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.8619 LTPIA | 0.7333 LTPIA | 0.1286 LTPIA | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 0.898 LTPIA | 0.9315 LTPIA | 0.0335 LTPIA | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education, Hong Kong, China or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0.9181 LTPIA against 0.9118 LTPIA in Hong Kong, China as of 2018.
- What is the difference in proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education between Hong Kong, China and Serbia?
- 0.0063 LTPIA, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Serbia rank globally for proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 6th and Serbia ranks 5th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted speaks language of the test parity index (LTPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The adjusted speaks language of the test parity index (LTPIA) is calculated by dividing the value for the indicator for students who do not speak the language of the test at home by the value for the indicator for students who speak the language of the test at home. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted speaks language of the test parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted LTPI equal to 1 indicates parity between students who do and do not speak the language of the test at home. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of students who speak the language of test at home. A value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of students who do not speak the language of the test at home. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/