Finland vs Netherlands: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at
Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at over time
- Finland
- Netherlands
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0.9826 LPIA against 0.9608 LPIA in Netherlands, a difference of 0.0218 LPIA.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Netherlands ahead.
Finland ranks 6th and Netherlands ranks 7th of 39 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 LPIA | 1.01 LPIA | 0.0044 LPIA | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 0.9926 LPIA | 0.9608 LPIA | 0.0318 LPIA | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at, Finland or Netherlands?
- Finland, at 0.9826 LPIA against 0.9608 LPIA in Netherlands as of 2018.
- What is the difference in proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at between Finland and Netherlands?
- 0.0218 LPIA, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Netherlands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2012.
- How do Finland and Netherlands rank globally for proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at?
- Finland ranks 6th and Netherlands ranks 7th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted location parity index (LPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Adjusted Location Parity Index (LPIA) is calculated by dividing the rural value for the indicator by the urban value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted location parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted LPI equal to 1 indicates parity between rural and urban locations. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of urban locations and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of rural locations. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/