Australia vs New Zealand: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at
Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at over time
- Australia
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0.8236 LPIA against 0.7904 LPIA in Australia, a difference of 0.0332 LPIA.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 23rd and New Zealand ranks 22nd of 39 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.933 LPIA | 0.9639 LPIA | 0.031 LPIA | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0.8387 LPIA | 0.8525 LPIA | 0.0138 LPIA | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at, Australia or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 0.8236 LPIA against 0.7904 LPIA in Australia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at between Australia and New Zealand?
- 0.0332 LPIA, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Australia and New Zealand rank globally for proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at?
- Australia ranks 23rd and New Zealand ranks 22nd of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted location parity index (LPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Adjusted Location Parity Index (LPIA) is calculated by dividing the rural value for the indicator by the urban value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted location parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted LPI equal to 1 indicates parity between rural and urban locations. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of urban locations and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of rural locations. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/