Republic of Korea vs Lithuania: PISA: Male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C
PISA: Male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C over time
- Republic of Korea
- Lithuania
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Republic of Korea ranks 20th and Lithuania ranks 20th of 54 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 1.0% | 1.0% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.7% | 1.0% | 0.3% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c, Republic of Korea or Lithuania?
- Republic of Korea, at 1.0% against 1.0% in Lithuania as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c between Republic of Korea and Lithuania?
- 0.0%, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Lithuania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do Republic of Korea and Lithuania rank globally for pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 1c?
- Republic of Korea ranks 20th and Lithuania ranks 20th of 54 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: Male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 1C. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old male students scoring higher than 189 but lower than or equal to 262 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 1C can understand and affirm the meaning of short, syntactically simple sentences on a literal level, and read for a clear and simple purpose within a limited amount of time. Tasks at this level involve simple vocabulary and syntactic structures. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/