Belgium vs Czech Republic: PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 3
PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 3 over time
- Belgium
- Czech Republic
How they compare
Czech Republic currently reports 28.7% against 28.4% in Belgium, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Czech Republic has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 19th and Czech Republic ranks 16th of 52 countries.
Czech Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Czech Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.8% | 28.0% | 1.2% | Czech Republic |
| 2010s | 28.0% | 29.4% | 1.4% | Czech Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 3, Belgium or Czech Republic?
- Czech Republic, at 28.7% against 28.4% in Belgium as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 3 between Belgium and Czech Republic?
- 0.3%, with Czech Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Czech Republic?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Belgium and Czech Republic rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 3?
- Belgium ranks 19th and Czech Republic ranks 16th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 3. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 484 but less than or equal to 559 on the PISA science scale. At Level 3, students can draw upon moderately complex content knowledge to identify or construct explanations of familiar phenomena. In less familiar or more complex situations, they can construct explanations with relevant cueing or support. They can draw on elements of procedural or epistemic knowledge to carry out a simple experiment in a constrained context. Level 3 students are able to distinguish between scientific and non-scientific issues and identify the evidence supporting a scientific claim. Data reflect country performance in the stated year, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/