Chile vs Jordan: PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 2

Chile
33.1%
in 2018
Jordan
32.4%
in 2018
Chile rank
2nd
Jordan rank
4th

PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 2 over time

  • Chile
  • Jordan
010203040200620122018

How they compare

Chile currently reports 33.1% against 32.4% in Jordan, a difference of 0.7%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Jordan ahead.

Chile ranks 2nd and Jordan ranks 4th of 52 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Jordan Difference Ahead
2000s 32.5% 31.5% 1.0% Chile
2010s 32.9% 31.8% 1.1% Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 2, Chile or Jordan?
Chile, at 33.1% against 32.4% in Jordan as of 2018.
What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 2 between Chile and Jordan?
0.7%, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Jordan?
5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
How do Chile and Jordan rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 2?
Chile ranks 2nd and Jordan ranks 4th of 52 countries.
Where does this data come from?
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 2. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 2
Source
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
52 places, 296 data points, 2003–2018
Last refreshed

Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 410 but less than or equal to 484 on the PISA science scale. At Level 2, students are able to draw on everyday content knowledge and basic procedural knowledge to identify an appropriate scientific explanation, interpret data, and identify the question being addressed in a simple experimental design. They can use basic or everyday scientific knowledge to identify a valid conclusion from a simple data set. Level 2 students demonstrate basic epistemic knowledge by being able to identify questions that can be investigated scientifically. Data reflect country performance in the stated year, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/