Argentina vs Lithuania: PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 2
PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 2 over time
- Argentina
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 28.4% against 27.0% in Argentina, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Lithuania ahead.
Argentina ranks 20th and Lithuania ranks 18th of 52 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.1% | 28.2% | 2.0% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 30.7% | 28.5% | 2.2% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 2, Argentina or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 28.4% against 27.0% in Argentina as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 2 between Argentina and Lithuania?
- 1.4%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Lithuania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do Argentina and Lithuania rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 2?
- Argentina ranks 20th and Lithuania ranks 18th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 2. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 410 but less than or equal to 484 on the PISA science scale. At Level 2, students are able to draw on everyday content knowledge and basic procedural knowledge to identify an appropriate scientific explanation, interpret data, and identify the question being addressed in a simple experimental design. They can use basic or everyday scientific knowledge to identify a valid conclusion from a simple data set. Level 2 students demonstrate basic epistemic knowledge by being able to identify questions that can be investigated scientifically. Data reflect country performance in the stated year, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/