Indonesia vs Mexico: PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 1A
PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 1A over time
- Indonesia
- Mexico
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 41.4% against 34.2% in Mexico, a difference of 7.2%.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.2 times Mexico's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 2nd and Mexico ranks 3rd of 52 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.4% | 32.6% | 8.8% | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 41.2% | 34.5% | 6.7% | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 1a, Indonesia or Mexico?
- Indonesia, at 41.4% against 34.2% in Mexico as of 2018.
- What is the difference in pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 1a between Indonesia and Mexico?
- 7.2%, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Mexico?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Indonesia and Mexico rank globally for pisa: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). level 1a?
- Indonesia ranks 2nd and Mexico ranks 3rd of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: 15-year-olds by science proficiency level (%). Level 1A. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 335 but less than or equal to 410 on the PISA science scale. At Level 1A, students are able to use basic or everyday content and procedural knowledge to recognise or identify explanations of simple scientific phenomenon. With support, they can undertake structured scientific enquiries with no more than two variables. They are able to identify simple causal or correlational relationships and interpret graphical and visual data that require a low level of cognitive demand. Level 1a students can select the best scientific explanation for given data in familiar personal, local and global contexts. Data reflect country performance in the stated year, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/